[Clayart] weird element readings. help!
jebyler2 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 12:31:31 EDT 2016
This is true, but I sort of remember checking the resistance before I put them in last time, and they read 16ohms as they could have. But memory is a finicky and flaky thing, especially as we get older. If I were more OCD, or perhaps wiser, I would keep a notebook with info such as initial resistance of elements, what they should be to factory spec, what they read when replaced, etc. But in the end, the record keeping might end up being more of a chore than solving the problems for as much as I actually need to work on these things.
> On Oct 22, 2016, at 5:49 PM, L TURNER <magnolia.mud.list at gmail.com> wrote:
> A third possibility is that the length of the elements are not what you are
> assuming they are. Just because they were factory replacements when they
> were installed, they may actually be different from as the new replacements.
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:03 PM, jonathan byler <jebyler2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> #2 seems the most likely. nothing is touching along the length of the
>> coils, at least nothing obvious. I’m going to fire it up and take amperage
>> readings on the individual coils and see what it looks like. If nothing
>> looks out of the ordinary on the current draw, I’ll have to let it be a
>> mystery for now.
>>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 11:33 AM, L TURNER <magnolia.mud.list at gmail.com>
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:35 PM, jonathan byler <jebyler2 at gmail.com>
>>>> I had the lead wires off the elements in question. I was using a
>>>> grade fluke VOM… readings for new elements are spot on. still baffled.
>>>> Contacted the manufacturer, and they told me that the last few sets of
>>>> elements that I bought were the right part, so unlikely that I have the
>>>> wrong ones in there. I’ll do some more poking around and see what I
>>>> The kiln saw lots of nasty sulfur in the atmosphere from too many
>>>> with goldart based clay… maybe some weird chemical reaction took place?
>>>> Never seen this before.
>>> several lines of thought to explore based on that concept that
>>> moves through the past of least resistance. Both could be applicable.
>>> 1. the wire in the coils are stuck together somewhere along the length of
>>> the elements. Possibly in several locations. This would make the
>>> length shorter than expected.
>>> 2. the corrosion layer on the wire is more conductive than the interior
>>> metal alloy. Normally the corrosion layer is an nonconductive oxide.
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <http://lists.clayartworld.com/pipermail/clayart/
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.clayartworld.com/pipermail/clayart/attachments/20161022/c74f1078/attachment.html>
More information about the Clayart