[Clayart] Old old old cones

[David Woof]

Rox said: "Hi, potty friends, I’ve received information that asserts OLD CONES are less accurate!
Is that even a little bit true?"

Hi Rox,
Paul Lewing says "No not true" and that is true enough for practical "potty" usage as most "potty' glazes and firing profile "truths" fall really short of absolute chemical and rocket science truths....so fire away and let your Rox out to play.

Love,
Woof...........your "Potty" friend on the other side of the Coastal Mountains.......My Muse is always gittin on mah case aboot sum'thin or ah'nuther!!!...an she says that if one is working out in a glass Martial Arts DoJo, one should not throw Rox!!!........................................................................................................................................
*****************************************************************************************
________________________________
From: Clayart <clayart-bounces at lists.clayartworld.com> on behalf of Roxanne Hunnicutt <roxhun at gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2022 1:58 PM
To: clayart at lists.clayartworld.com <clayart at lists.clayartworld.com>
Subject: [Clayart] Old old old cones

Hi, potty friends,

I’ve received information that asserts OLD CONES are less accurate!

Is that even a little bit true?

If so will, old cones be higher or lower and WHY.  How? Could comes age?

Rox in oregon where it raine today and maybe our summer of smoke is over!!!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clayartworld.com/pipermail/clayart/attachments/20221022/1eda1726/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clayartworld.com/pipermail/clayart/attachments/20221023/729fa630/attachment.htm>